Skip to content
NCBNational Capability Benchmark
Navigate with โ†‘ โ†“Enter to openEsc to close

Challenge the benchmark

Choose a score and give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider it.

When you submit, the form attaches the current score and confidence for the country and capability you chose.

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

Documented examples

Each record describes something a country built that the indicators do not capture. The source provides the published number; the mechanism is our interpretation.

Scores describe outcomes. These records describe how a country acted, what it needed and what happened. 742 of 742 records include a mechanism. They do not affect scores.

Narrow the list

5 of 742 deliveries

Anticipation

1 delivery linked to Government foresight capacity.

Belgiumsince 1959still operatingbears on Government foresight capacity

Bureau federal du Plan

Belgium's Federal Planning Bureau, which produces the government's economic forecasts and long-term demographic, ageing, energy and transport outlooks, published 34 publications in 2025 and employed 91 full-time equivalents at the end of the year, down from 96 at the end of 2023, after it stopped replacing departing staff in 2024 to meet savings targets.

91 FTE, staff, full-time equivalents at 31 december, 2025-12-31. 96 FTE, staff, full-time equivalents at 31 december (earlier level, not shown to be a peak), 2023-12-31. Bureau federal du Plan, Rapport d'activite 2025, retrieved 2026-10-02.

The move, and what it needed

A statutory, de facto independent planning bureau receives mandates from government, parliament and social partners, and publishes forecasts and long-term outlooks that the federal budget and pension debates rely on; in a savings drive the government cut its grant and it stopped replacing leavers.

Preconditions

  • A statute that makes its forecasts the official basis for the budget
  • Social partners and parliament as co-principals, which protects independence
  • A core grant large enough to keep long-term modelling teams, which savings measures are now eroding

Limits: The bureau reports on itself; the 91 FTE (80 funded by the federal grant, 11 by contracts) and the hiring freeze are on PDF page 12, the 34 publications on page 19. The 96 FTE is from the 2023 activity report (https://www.plan.be/sites/default/files/documents/OTH_ACTIV_2023_FR.pdf) and the 2024 report gives 94 (https://www.plan.be/sites/default/files/documents/OTH_ACTIV_2024_FR.pdf). The record is filed as operating, not eroded: the fall is five FTE, about 5 percent, from a 2023 level that is not shown to be a peak (earlier reports were not found at the same address), and output held, with 37 publications in 2023, 45 in 2024 and 34 in 2025. The staff trend and the bureau's statement that it no longer replaces leavers to meet savings targets are a documented squeeze on capacity, and a later report showing a deeper loss would justify eroded. Most of the bureau's work is medium-term forecasting and policy costing, not scenario-based strategic foresight; its long-term population, ageing and sustainable development outlooks are the foresight part. The report says nearly 40 percent of staff will retire within ten years, which is a risk stated by the bureau, not a measured loss. The 1959 start is the Act of 23 December 1959 named on the bureau's legal basis page (https://www.plan.be/en/about-us/legal-basis).

Coordination

1 delivery linked to Public-private collaboration.

Belgiumsince 2023still operatingbears on Public-private collaboration

De Kade prison in Antwerp, a federal DBFM contract

Belgium's federal Buildings Agency had the new 440-place prison de Kade in Antwerp, part of the federal prisons masterplan, designed, built and financed by the consortium Hortus Conclusus under a DBFM contract, with works from 2023 to 2026 at a construction cost of EUR 195.5 million and an annual availability fee of EUR 23.1 million for 25 years of maintenance, after which the prison returns to the federal state free of charge.

195.5 EUR million, construction cost of the dbfm prison, excluding vat, 2025-09. 23.1 EUR million per year, annual availability fee, including vat, 2023 prices, 2025-09. Rรฉgie des Bรขtiments / Regie der Gebouwen, Nouvelle prison ยซ de Kade ยป (project page, updated September 2025), retrieved 2026-10-02.

The move, and what it needed

The federal Buildings Agency tendered a design, build, finance and maintain contract for a new prison, a consortium of an infrastructure investor and contractors built and financed it, and the state pays an annual availability fee for 25 years while the Justice ministry runs the prison.

Preconditions

  • A federal prisons masterplan with a pipeline of projects to justify the procurement effort
  • Legal and financial advisers for the agency (here a consortium led by Stibbe)
  • Domestic contractors and investors able to carry construction and 25-year maintenance risk

Where else it has been used: The same availability-payment structure as the Czech D4 (cze-d4-ppp), applied to social infrastructure instead of a road.

Limits: The page is the contracting agency's own project sheet. It says the prison 'a รฉtรฉ rรฉalisรฉe' under a DBFM contract and that Antwerp 'now has two prisons', but it states the works period as 2023 to 2026 and gives no opening date or planned date, so the record cannot show whether the prison opened on time or on budget; status operating rests on the page's own past tense, updated September 2025. The construction cost and the availability fee are the agency's figures, not an audit; 25 years of fees at EUR 23.1 million in 2023 prices would be about EUR 578 million before indexation (our arithmetic), well above the construction cost, which is the normal shape of a DBFM but means the cost to the state is the fee stream, not the build cost. One project is not a programme: the page places the prison in the federal masterplan for detention and internment, but this record documents only this contract and says nothing about the masterplan's other projects. The consortium's members are named on the page (TINC, Jan De Nul, EEG, with ISS for services).

Adaptability

3 deliveries linked to Institutional responsiveness, Disaster preparedness and recovery.

Belgiumsince 2020delivered and closedbears on Institutional responsiveness

Chรดmage temporaire corona, 2020

Belgium's National Employment Office treated every COVID-19 work stoppage as temporary unemployment for force majeure and paid allowances to 939,532 workers for March 2020 and 1,117,133 for April, when 1,221,412 workers, 35.3 percent of private and contractual employees, were declared temporarily unemployed; almost 1.4 million received at least one payment during 2020.

1,117,133 workers, workers paid a temporary unemployment allowance for april 2020, 2020-04. 939,532 workers, workers paid a temporary unemployment allowance for march 2020, 2020-03. Office national de l'emploi (ONEM), Chรดmage temporaire en chiffres (press page, May 2020); annual report figures in Rapport annuel ONEM 2020, retrieved 2026-10-02.

The move, and what it needed

The employment office widened an existing rule, temporary unemployment for force majeure, to cover every corona stoppage and simplified the employer procedure, so firms could suspend contracts without proving economic grounds and existing payment bodies paid workers within the month.

Preconditions

  • A standing temporary unemployment regime with electronic social risk declarations from employers
  • Payment bodies, including trade union funds, already paying unemployment benefits
  • A legal concept (force majeure) broad enough to be reinterpreted by the administration

Where else it has been used: France's activitรฉ partielle (fra-activite-partielle) followed the same route of stretching an industrial instrument to the whole economy; Belgium's version paid workers directly rather than reimbursing employers.

Limits: The monthly counts and the 35.3 percent share are on the ONEM press page; the 1.4 million for 2020 and the monthly average of 504,657 are on the annual report page (https://www.onem.be/espace-presse/rapport-annuel-onem-2020). The press page gives no date for the rule change itself, so the record shows speed only as payment for the first month of the crisis, not as days from shock to rule. ONEM does not pay most allowances itself: the payment bodies (the trade union funds CSC, FGTB and CGSLB, and the public fund CAPAC) do, and the press page splits the amounts between them. The 35.3 percent is computed on 3,458,136 salaried employees excluding civil servants. A worker counted in April was unemployed for 14 days on average, and only 20 percent for the whole month, so the head count overstates lost hours. The cost was large: ONEM's annual report records EUR 4.042 billion of extra temporary unemployment spending in 2020. ONEM later ran controls on corona temporary unemployment; their results are not reflected here.

Belgiumsince 2006dismantledbears on Disaster preparedness and recovery

Federal strategic stock of protective masks, and its dismantling

The Federal Public Service Public Health held a strategic stock of masks for pandemic influenza in military warehouses in Namur from 2006, sized at 32 million surgical masks when the Bioethics Committee reviewed the pandemic plan in 2009. It destroyed the expired masks in operations in late 2015 and late 2018 without replacing them, so Belgium entered the COVID-19 crisis in early 2020 with no strategic mask stock.

0 masks, federal strategic stock of masks at the start of the covid-19 crisis, early 2020. 32,000,000 surgical masks, strategic stock of surgical masks referred to in the 2009 review of the pandemic plan, 2009. Chambre des reprรฉsentants de Belgique, Rapport de la Commission spรฉciale COVID-19, DOC 55 1394/002, 13 September 2021, retrieved 2026-10-02.

The move, and what it needed

From 2006 the federal health administration stored a national reserve of masks under its pandemic plan, then destroyed expired stock in 2015 and 2018 without a replacement contract, so the reserve ran down to nothing between two pandemics.

Preconditions

  • A pandemic plan that names a stock size but no owner for rotating and replacing it
  • Storage borrowed from another department (Defence), with conditions that degraded the stock

Limits: The zero is not a counted figure. It is our reading of the committee's prose statement that no strategic mask stock existed when the crisis began. The 32 million is the stock named in the 2009 bioethics advice and the plan's target; the report never gives an audited count of masks actually held in any year. Some of the stock was probably unusable before it was destroyed: the report records that the Namur warehouses lost their heating in 2012 and the masks stayed in unheated storage. The dates of destruction (late 2015 and late 2018) come from a chronology entry built from hearing testimony, which the committee marks as contradicted by other witnesses, not from a finding of its own. Responsibility for the decision not to replace the stock is disputed in the report itself between the former health minister and the experts heard. A mask stock is one narrow input to pandemic preparedness. It says nothing about the pandemic plan, testing, hospital surge capacity or the later rebuilding of a stock.

Belgiumsince 2017still operatingbears on Disaster preparedness and recovery

BE-Alert

The National Crisis Centre of the Federal Public Service Interior has run BE-Alert, the national system that lets municipalities and provinces alert the population by SMS, including location-based SMS, and information screens, since 2017. By 1 September 2025, 537 of 565 municipalities, covering 95 percent of Belgian territory, were affiliated, 1,369,659 citizen addresses were registered, and the system had been used 273 times in 2025.

537 municipalities of 565, municipalities affiliated to be-alert, September 2025. 1,369,659 addresses, citizen addresses registered in be-alert, 1 September 2025. Centre de Crise National, SPF Intรฉrieur, 'Toutes les communes flamandes sont affiliรฉes ร  BE-Alert', 16 September 2025, retrieved 2026-10-02.

The move, and what it needed

The federal crisis centre built one national alerting platform and offered it to municipalities and provinces, which keep the legal power to warn. It added channels over time (registered SMS, location-based SMS, screens) and runs an annual national test.

Preconditions

  • Emergency-planning powers held by mayors and governors, so a federal tool needs local uptake to work
  • Mobile operators obliged or willing to send location-based messages
  • A federal budget for a platform that municipalities can join voluntarily

Limits: This is the crisis centre's own news release, not a statistic or an audit. Affiliation means a municipality can send alerts, not that it does so well or in time: the release gives no measure of how fast or how accurately any alert reached people in a real emergency. The 273 uses in 2025 mix real alerts, vigilance messages and tests, and the release does not split them. One person can register up to five addresses, so the count is not people. Location-based SMS reaches unregistered phones, but this page gives no reach figure for it. Coverage took eight years to reach 95 percent of territory, and 28 Walloon municipalities were still outside it in 2025. The page says nothing about the July 2021 floods in Wallonia, the largest recent test of national warning, so it cannot show that the system works when a major shock arrives. A warning channel is one part of preparedness and says nothing about recovery.