Skip to content
NCBNational Capability Benchmark
Navigate with โ†‘ โ†“Enter to openEsc to close

Challenge the benchmark

Choose a score and give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider it.

When you submit, the form attaches the current score and confidence for the country and capability you chose.

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

Documented examples

Each record describes something a country built that the indicators do not capture. The source provides the published number; the mechanism is our interpretation.

Scores describe outcomes. These records describe how a country acted, what it needed and what happened. 742 of 742 records include a mechanism. They do not affect scores.

Narrow the list

9 of 742 deliveries

Anticipation

1 delivery linked to Government foresight capacity.

Singaporesince 2009still operatingbears on Government foresight capacity

Centre for Strategic Futures, foresight inside government

Singapore established the Centre for Strategic Futures in 2009 inside the Prime Minister's Office strategy system to study blind spots, run long-term futures research and develop foresight methods.

2009 year, year the centre for strategic futures was established, 2009. Centre for Strategic Futures, Who we are, retrieved 2026-08-30.

The move, and what it needed

A central strategy unit gives government a standing place to examine emerging risks and challenge assumptions before those risks become immediate policy demands.

Preconditions

  • A centre of government willing to receive uncomfortable analysis
  • Access to policy teams that can act on long-horizon findings
  • Methods and networks that keep foresight connected to evidence

Limits: Creating a foresight unit shows a formal capability for examining uncertainty, not whether its work changes budgets, policies or decisions. The centre describes its own mandate and does not publish a counterfactual for decisions made without it.

Agency

1 delivery linked to Adults doing digital tasks.

Singaporesince 2016still operatingbears on Adults doing digital tasks

Singapore's national ICT-skills measurement and baseline

Singapore's Department of Statistics ICT-skills table reports 99.0% in the total row for residents aged 16โ€“74 in 2025, while 55.2% could use a basic arithmetic formula in a spreadsheet; the government uses the series to track SDG 4.4.1 and its Digital Skills for Life framework.

99 % of residents aged 16-74, residents with an ict skill in the total row, 2025. 55.2 % of residents aged 16-74, basic spreadsheet arithmetic skill, 2025. Singapore Department of Statistics, annual ICT-skills dataset (IMDA source), retrieved 2026-08-31.

The move, and what it needed

Singapore pairs a recurring skills measurement with a public baseline framework, Digital Skills for Life, and targeted support such as Seniors Go Digital. The combination makes digital capability a population service obligation rather than a one-off computer course, while the task rows reveal where basic access still masks deeper gaps.

Preconditions

  • A statistical agency and digital ministry able to repeat a common task taxonomy and publish the results
  • Universal connectivity and trusted public services that give adults reasons to practise digital tasks in daily life
  • Accessible coaching, devices and safety guidance for older and lower-income residents who are least likely to learn informally

Where else it has been used: Digital-skills programmes travel when measurement, everyday use and targeted help reinforce one another; connectivity statistics alone can conceal a population that still cannot complete consequential tasks.

Limits: The table records task-specific self-reported or survey-derived skills for Singapore residents, not independently tested proficiency, workplace transfer or equal access. The age base changed from residents aged 15 and above in 2016โ€“2020 to ages 16โ€“74 from 2021, and a high total can hide weak performance on harder tasks such as spreadsheet work.

Coordination

1 delivery linked to Public-private collaboration.

Singaporesince 2013dismantledbears on Public-private collaboration

Tuaspring desalination partnership, and its collapse

PUB contracted Hyflux's Tuaspring Pte Ltd under a water purchase agreement for Singapore's largest desalination plant, opened in 2013, then terminated the agreement on 17 April 2019 after the operator failed to keep the plant reliably operational, took the plant into public ownership in May 2019 and spent around $80 million on repairs due for completion in mid-2021.

80 million SGD, pub repair cost after taking over the failed partnership plant, 2021-02. Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment, Singapore, written reply to Parliamentary Question on Tuas South Desalination Plant, retrieved 2026-10-01.

The move, and what it needed

PUB bought desalinated water from a private developer under a long-term purchase agreement and, when the developer's finances failed, used the contract's default and termination remedies to take the plant into public ownership and repair it itself.

Preconditions

  • A water agency with in-house capacity to run the same plant technology it contracts out, here PUB's own Tuas Desalination Plant
  • Termination and step-in clauses written into the purchase agreement before anything went wrong
  • A private partner whose balance sheet depended on an integrated water and power plant that could lose money on the power side

Limits: This is one contract failing, not the end of Singapore's public-private water model: PUB's own page lists Keppel Marina East (2020) and Jurong Island (2022) desalination plants built and run by private firms after the collapse, so the partnership approach survived and the record documents the loss of one delivery inside it. The $80 million is a ministerial answer to a parliamentary question, not an audited figure, and it covers repairs only, not PUB's operating costs since takeover or what the private partner's investors lost. The original 25-year term and contracted capacity of the agreement are reported only by press and secondary sources found today, so the record does not carry them. A hostile reviewer can also read the episode as the state's contractual safeguards working, which is how the minister presented it: the water supply was not interrupted.

Trust

1 delivery linked to Court case clearance rate.

Singaporesince 2006still operatingbears on Court case clearance rate

Singapore Courts' case-clearance discipline

Singapore's State Courts disposed of 21,816 civil cases against 20,358 filings in 2023, a 107% civil clearance rate; its Community Justice and Tribunals courts recorded a 99% clearance rate in the same year.

107 % of incoming civil cases, state courts civil-case clearance rate, 2023. 99 % of incoming cases, community justice and tribunals clearance rate, 2023. Singapore Judiciary, Caseload statistics 2023, retrieved 2026-08-31.

The move, and what it needed

Singapore Courts publish workload by court and case type, set clearance as a management measure and combine procedural reform with specialised tribunals and dispute-resolution pathways. The public series makes backlogs visible while the court system can shift suitable disputes into faster channels without pretending that every case is the same.

Preconditions

  • A judiciary with reliable case-management data and authority to redesign procedure across court tiers
  • Registries, judges, mediators and tribunals that can route cases by complexity rather than use one queue for all disputes
  • A public accountability norm that treats unresolved caseload as an operational problem while protecting judicial independence

Where else it has been used: Court-clearance management travels when administrative data, triage and dispute resolution reduce stock without turning speed into the only definition of justice.

Limits: Clearance is disposals divided by filings in the same year, so it can exceed 100% when courts work through earlier stock; it does not show timeliness, fairness, legal-aid access, enforcement or the quality of decisions. The Singapore figures cover court workloads and are not a comparable cross-country civil-justice index without harmonised case definitions.

Learning

1 delivery linked to Adult learning participation.

Singaporesince 2015still operatingbears on Adult learning participation

SkillsFuture Credit

Singapore gave every citizen aged 25 and over an individual training account in 2016 and keeps topping it up, and in 2024 260,000 Singaporeans spent credit on courses, up 35 percent on the year before.

260,000 people, singaporeans who used skillsfuture credit in the year, 2024. Skills and Workforce Development Agency, formerly SkillsFuture Singapore, year-in-review 2024, retrieved 2026-08-27.

The move, and what it needed

The state deposits money in a named account each citizen owns, publishes a course registry with subsidies, and lets individual demand rather than employers decide what gets learned, with top-ups aimed at mid-career workers.

Preconditions

  • A single national identity and payments rail to run the accounts on
  • A subsidised training market large enough to spend the credit in
  • Fiscal surpluses to fund top-ups a decade running

Where else it has been used: France's Compte Personnel de Formation is the closest sibling. Both show the same failure mode of low-value courses chasing the credit, which each has had to prune from its registry.

Limits: Usage is the programme reporting on itself, and a usage count says nothing about whether the training raised skills or wages. About 260,000 users in a year is under a tenth of the adult citizen population, and separate reporting notes most citizens had not touched their top-up. The record evidences a durable mechanism for adult learning, not a transformation of participation.

Experimentation

1 delivery linked to Firms through regulatory sandboxes.

Singaporesince 2016still operatingbears on Firms through regulatory sandboxes

MAS FinTech Regulatory Sandbox variants

Singapore's Monetary Authority operates three FinTech Regulatory Sandbox variantsโ€”Sandbox, Sandbox Express and Sandbox Plusโ€”giving firms distinct routes to test regulated products with real customers under defined safeguards.

3 sandbox variants, mas fintech regulatory sandbox variants, 2022. Singapore Economic Development Board, overview of the MAS FinTech Regulatory Sandbox, retrieved 2026-08-31.

The move, and what it needed

MAS made experimentation a staged regulatory service: firms needing tailored controls use the original sandbox, lower-risk activities can use Sandbox Express, and promising proposals can receive a streamlined route with support. Each variant keeps a live test bounded while giving the regulator evidence before a full licence.

Preconditions

  • A financial regulator with authority to vary requirements temporarily and monitor live customer activity
  • Clear entry, boundary and exit criteria so a sandbox does not become indefinite unlicensed operation
  • A dense financial and technology ecosystem in which tested products can find counterparties, capital and a path to licensing

Where else it has been used: Regulatory sandboxes travel best as a portfolio matched to risk: one universal process can be too slow for low-risk tests and too loose for products that move real money.

Limits: Counting three sandbox routes shows regulatory design and breadth, not applications received, firms graduating to full licences, customer protection, failure rates or the cost of supervision. The EDB account is an official ecosystem description and includes illustrative company cases rather than an independent evaluation of all experiments.

Adaptability

2 deliveries linked to Institutional responsiveness, Disaster preparedness and recovery.

Singaporesince 2020delivered and closedbears on Institutional responsiveness

Jobs Support Scheme and the four 2020 Budgets

Singapore's Ministry of Finance introduced the Jobs Support Scheme in the Unity Budget of 18 February 2020, raised and extended it through the Resilience, Solidarity and Fortitude Budgets, the fourth of them presented on 26 May 2020, and disbursed $22.6 billion of wage support from April to December 2020.

22.6 billion SGD, jobs support scheme wage support disbursed, 2020-04 to 2020-12. 4 budgets, budgets presented to parliament in 2020 by 26 may, 2020-05-26. Ministry of Finance, Singapore, press release on the interim assessment of 2020 COVID-19 Budget measures, retrieved 2026-10-01.

The move, and what it needed

The Finance Ministry built one wage-subsidy scheme on the existing payroll and pension contribution records, paid it automatically without applications, and then changed its rate and duration in each supplementary budget as the lockdown was imposed and extended.

Preconditions

  • A payroll and social contribution register that already identifies every local employee and employer
  • Fiscal reserves that Parliament could draw on without borrowing
  • A cabinet and Parliament able to pass supplementary budgets within weeks

Where else it has been used: Similar automatic wage subsidies ran in other countries during the pandemic, including Australia's JobKeeper and Germany's Kurzarbeit, which already existed; the distinctive part here was paying without applications through existing contribution records.

Limits: Every figure is the Ministry of Finance assessing its own measures. Disbursement measures how fast money moved, not whether the rules changed for the right reasons or whether the jobs would have been lost without it; the ministry's own job-saving figure on the same page is a modelled estimate, and the record does not carry it. The speed rested on accumulated reserves that most of the benchmarked countries do not have, so the case shows what a cash-rich centre of government can do, not responsiveness under fiscal constraint. Four budgets in about 14 weeks counts revisions; it does not show that each revision was well targeted, and wage subsidies paid on every local employee reached firms that would have kept their workers anyway. The scheme was temporary by design and wound down after the crisis, so the record is a concluded delivery and not evidence of standing institutional agility.

Singaporesince 1976still operatingbears on Disaster preparedness and recovery

PUB drainage programme and the shrinking of flood-prone land

Singapore's drainage authorities, the Drainage Department and later PUB, expanded the national drainage system under a drainage master plan, with a development drainage code from 1976, and reduced flood-prone areas from about 3,200 hectares in the 1970s to less than 25 hectares by 2025, with about $2.5 billion spent on drainage upgrades since 2011.

25 hectares (upper bound, 'less than'), flood-prone area remaining, 2025-02. 3,200 hectares, flood-prone area in the 1970s, 1970s. Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment, Singapore, oral reply to Parliamentary Question on drainage improvement, retrieved 2026-10-01.

The move, and what it needed

A single drainage authority drew a national master plan, built and widened canals and drains against it, and wrote flood protection into the development code so that every new building carried its own platform level and runoff controls.

Preconditions

  • One authority with jurisdiction over drainage across the whole territory
  • Planning control strong enough to impose platform levels and detention requirements on every developer
  • A small, fully urbanised catchment where engineering can reach most flood-prone land

Where else it has been used: The source-control rule, detention tanks and rain gardens required on larger sites since 2014, is the part that travels to larger cities; the full reduction depended on a city-state's control of land use.

Limits: Flood-prone area is PUB's own definition, counted by the agency that is responsible for reducing it, and the method behind the count is not published with it. The 1970s baseline is a rounded single figure with no year. An intermediate official figure, 40 hectares in 2013 in the PUB annual report, is consistent with a falling series, but the curve cannot be rebuilt from one dataset. The drop combines drainage works with land reclamation, raised platform levels and redevelopment, so it does not isolate the drainage programme. Flash floods still occur at listed hotspots, and the number says nothing about recovery from a major shock, because Singapore has not had a catastrophic flood in the period to test it. Most of the reduction predates the climate projections the ministry now plans against, so it shows capacity built against past rainfall, not readiness for sea-level rise. The started year is when the drainage code began, not the first drainage works.

Building

1 delivery linked to Large project delivery.

Singaporesince 1960still operatingbears on Large project delivery

Housing and Development Board, public housing at scale

Singapore set up the Housing and Development Board in 1960 to address a severe housing shortage, and it built more than 21,000 flats within its first three years.

21,000 flats, flats built in the first three years, 1963. Housing and Development Board, Our history, retrieved 2026-08-30.

The move, and what it needed

A public housing authority combined land, planning, finance and construction into one delivery system, allowing a severe national shortage to be treated as a programme rather than as separate private projects.

Preconditions

  • Public authority over enough land for coordinated development
  • Finance and construction capacity that can be directed to a common programme
  • A long-term administrative mandate that survives individual projects

Limits: The early construction count shows delivery at scale, not housing quality, affordability or equal access over the full history of the programme. The account is published by the agency responsible for the programme.