Skip to content
NCBNational Capability Benchmark
Navigate with โ†‘ โ†“Enter to openEsc to close

Challenge the benchmark

Choose a score and give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider it.

When you submit, the form attaches the current score and confidence for the country and capability you chose.

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

Where does Cuba stand on Experimentation?

Dataset 9.3.0

This page reads one capability from the published data and is recomputed with every release. It separates what Cuba does, which makes the score, from what the country has, which sits beside the score, and places the country among the 10 countries at the nearest income. The text describes the data and recommends no policy.

The World Bank publishes no GDP per capita for Cuba, so the page forms no peer set and draws no comparison.

What does the score rest on?

Score1.5Confidence0.24very thin evidence

Confidence is in the very thin band, so the score rests on little evidence.

The Experimentation score is the equal-weight mean of the positions of three indicators on a 0 to 100 scale that every country sets together. Confidence measures the evidence behind the score and sits beside it as a second number.

The Experimentation score tracks GDP per capita at r = 0.72 across 120 countries.

Observed indicators

  • Resident patent applications

    21 per million people

    World Bank (IP.PAT.RESD), 2021

    Position on the scale1.1Peer medianno value0 peers with a value
  • Resident trademark applications

    1,840 per million people

    World Bank (IP.TMK.RSCT), 2021

    Position on the scale2.7Peer medianno value0 peers with a value
  • Resident industrial design applications

    14 per million people

    World Bank (IP.IDS.RSCT), 2021

    Position on the scale0.5Peer medianno value0 peers with a value
  • New public software repositories

    no value

    Position on the scaleno valuePeer medianno value0 peers with a value
  • Early-stage entrepreneurial activity

    no value

    Position on the scaleno valuePeer medianno value0 peers with a value
  • Tolerance of entrepreneurial failure

    no value

    Position on the scaleno valuePeer medianno value0 peers with a value

No comparable source yet, so lowering confidence: venture deals, firms through regulatory sandboxes, and university spinouts.

No condition is published beside Experimentation in this release, so the page shows only the indicators that make the score.

Where does Cuba sit among its peers?

The World Bank publishes no GDP per capita for Cuba, so the page forms no peer set and draws no comparison.

What this reading does not show

  • A national score is a coarse proxy. A capability forms in firms, cities, networks and groups below the level of the country, and a national average only describes the conditions they work in.
  • Peers share income and nothing else. Size, production structure, region and political regime are outside the rule, and a set of 10 countries can change with any revision to GDP.
  • An r reads the whole set at once and says nothing about one country alone. A correlation does not show a cause either.
  • The known artefacts that bear on Experimentation, described on the limits page: artefact A1.
  • And the ones every score in the benchmark carries: artefact A8, artefact A10.