Skip to content
NCBNational Capability Benchmark
Navigate with ↑ ↓Enter to openEsc to close

Challenge the benchmark

Choose a score and give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider it.

When you submit, the form attaches the current score and confidence for the country and capability you chose.

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

Where does Guinea stand on each capability?

Dataset 9.3.0

This page reads nine capabilities of Guinea from the published data and is recomputed with every release. Each row carries the score and the confidence as two numbers and compares the score with the median of the 10 countries at the nearest income. The rows follow the model order, and each opens the map of that capability.

How does each capability compare with the peers?

  • Anticipation

    Below the peer median, 10 of 10 peers scored

    Score10.1Confidence0.46Peer median24.6
  • Agency

    Below the peer median, 10 of 10 peers scored

    Confidence is in the thin band, so the score rests on little evidence.

    Score51.7Confidence0.41Peer median52.5
  • Coordination

    Below the peer median, 10 of 10 peers scored

    Confidence is in the thin band, so the score rests on little evidence.

    Score64.5Confidence0.31Peer median71.1
  • Trust

    At the peer median, 10 of 10 peers scored

    Confidence is in the thin band, so the score rests on little evidence.

    Score68.1Confidence0.30Peer median68.1
  • Learning

    Below the peer median, 10 of 10 peers scored

    Score17.7Confidence0.55Peer median32.3
  • Experimentation

    Below the peer median, 10 of 10 peers scored

    Confidence is in the very thin band, so the score rests on little evidence.

    Score0.3Confidence0.11Peer median1.2
  • Adaptability

    Below the peer median, 10 of 10 peers scored

    Score39.6Confidence0.46Peer median55.9
  • Building

    Above the peer median, 10 of 10 peers scored

    Confidence is in the thin band, so the score rests on little evidence.

    Score28.6Confidence0.44Peer median25.9
  • Shared Purpose

    No comparison, 8 of 10 peers scored

    No score in this release. Observed indicators: 1, under the minimum the model needs to form a mean.

    Scorenot scoredConfidence0.08Peer median47.5

Each row compares one score with one median. The capabilities do not add up, and the page forms no overall score.

Decision D136