Skip to content
NCBNational Capability Benchmark
Navigate with ↑ ↓Enter to openEsc to close

Challenge the benchmark

Choose a score and give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider it.

The selected score and confidence are read from the current country file when you submit.

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

All deliveries

Singapore, trust

Singapore Courts' case-clearance discipline

Singapore's State Courts disposed of 21,816 civil cases against 20,358 filings in 2023, a 107% civil clearance rate; its Community Justice and Tribunals courts recorded a 99% clearance rate in the same year.

Singaporesince 2006still operatingbears on Court case clearance rate

107 % of incoming civil cases, state courts civil-case clearance rate, 2023. 99 % of incoming cases, community justice and tribunals clearance rate, 2023. Singapore Judiciary, Caseload statistics 2023, retrieved 2026-08-31.

The move, and what it needed

Singapore Courts publish workload by court and case type, set clearance as a management measure and combine procedural reform with specialised tribunals and dispute-resolution pathways. The public series makes backlogs visible while the court system can shift suitable disputes into faster channels without pretending that every case is the same.

Preconditions

  • A judiciary with reliable case-management data and authority to redesign procedure across court tiers
  • Registries, judges, mediators and tribunals that can route cases by complexity rather than use one queue for all disputes
  • A public accountability norm that treats unresolved caseload as an operational problem while protecting judicial independence

Where it travelled: Court-clearance management travels when administrative data, triage and dispute resolution reduce stock without turning speed into the only definition of justice.

Limits: Clearance is disposals divided by filings in the same year, so it can exceed 100% when courts work through earlier stock; it does not show timeliness, fairness, legal-aid access, enforcement or the quality of decisions. The Singapore figures cover court workloads and are not a comparable cross-country civil-justice index without harmonised case definitions.

This record describes what Singapore delivered. It is linked to Court case clearance rate because no comparable dataset measures that capability. It does not affect the score or confidence.

More from Singapore

5 other deliveries from this country.

  • SkillsFuture Credit

    Singapore gave every citizen aged 25 and over an individual training account in 2016 and keeps topping it up, and in 2024 260,000 Singaporeans spent credit on courses, up 35 percent on the year before.

  • Housing and Development Board, public housing at scale

    Singapore set up the Housing and Development Board in 1960 to address a severe housing shortage, and it built more than 21,000 flats within its first three years.

  • Centre for Strategic Futures, foresight inside government

    Singapore established the Centre for Strategic Futures in 2009 inside the Prime Minister's Office strategy system to study blind spots, run long-term futures research and develop foresight methods.

  • MAS FinTech Regulatory Sandbox variants

    Singapore's Monetary Authority operates three FinTech Regulatory Sandbox variants—Sandbox, Sandbox Express and Sandbox Plus—giving firms distinct routes to test regulated products with real customers under defined safeguards.

  • Singapore's national ICT-skills measurement and baseline

    Singapore's Department of Statistics ICT-skills table reports 99.0% in the total row for residents aged 16–74 in 2025, while 55.2% could use a basic arithmetic formula in a spreadsheet; the government uses the series to track SDG 4.4.1 and its Digital Skills for Life framework.

Every delivery from Singapore