Skip to content
NCBNational Capability Benchmark
Navigate with ↑ ↓Enter to openEsc to close

Challenge the benchmark

Choose a score and give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider it.

When you submit, the form attaches the current score and confidence for the country and capability you chose.

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

Brazil below the national score

The national benchmark shows Brazil beside its peers. This page shows what the national number looks like with Brazil's states and institutions in view.

The national score is the first layer

The radar keeps the nine national dimensions together. The paragraph beside it explains what the shape can and cannot say.

255075100

Brazil's benchmark profile is a national view of a country with several centers of action. The federal score uses evidence that is comparable across the benchmark countries, so it shows where Brazil's capacity differs from its peers. It does not describe every state, municipality or delivery system: a federal ministry, a state government and a city can face different constraints and still contribute to the same national result. This page adds a sourced state range for one indicator, a map of institutions and the public challenges to Brazil's national scores. None of these is a second score. They show whether a national value is broadly consistent with its parts, where variation is large, which organizations mediate action and where the evidence stops. The state data uses the publisher's coefficient and year, and the benchmark keeps its national display and comparison frame. You can read the two views together, but a state average is not a capability score, and one institution does not explain a whole dimension.

Brazil beside four peers

Each mini-radar uses the same nine national dimensions and current comparison frame. Open one to read it beside Brazil, row by row and indicator by indicator.

One national value, 27 states

One indicator is available in the pilot. The state range adds detail without entering the country comparison.

National coefficient

0.503

2024

State range

0.430 to 0.547

27 federative units, 2024-12-31

Reconciliation rule: independent. The equal-unit recomposition is 0.486, against a national value of 0.503; the signed residual is -0.017. This is a diagnostic of the gap between the state view and the national statistic, not a state score or a failed national result. The values stay outside the NCB score.

Source: IBGE, PNAD Contínua, SIDRA table 7435, variable 10681.

Who acts locally

The map is an explanatory layer. It does not measure institutional performance or change the national scores.

the agency disagrees with this entry

Brazil's network contains 366 institutions and 382 sourced relationships. The same map appears here beside the radar and the state evidence.

Find an institution

82 shown

Democratic authority4

Justice and rights9

Oversight and integrity2

Strategy and management15

Finance and investment10

Science and technology5

Learning and workforce3

Data and digital infrastructure3

Regulation19

Public security and defense6

Territorial delivery6

Federal · Public company

Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social

Provides long-term finance and structures investment for firms and governments.

What it does

finances, plans.

Capabilities it bears on

Building, Agency, Anticipation

4 recorded relations

Institutional source

Authority

is attached to

Control

regulates

audits

audits

Funding

No funding relation is recorded.

Joint work

No joint work relation is recorded.

Each line reads left to right, in the direction of the relation. Select any institution to open its own profile.

How authority, control and money move

Each cell counts the relations running from the system in its row to the system in its column. Select a cell to read them.

89 relations in 35 of 121 cells

FromTo
Democratic authorityJustice and rightsOversight and integrityStrategy and managementFinance and investmentScience and technologyLearning and workforceData and digital infrastructureRegulationPublic security and defenseTerritorial delivery
Democratic authority
Justice and rights
Oversight and integrity
Strategy and management
Finance and investment
Science and technology
Learning and workforce
Data and digital infrastructure
Regulation
Public security and defense
Territorial delivery
Relations per cell12 to 45 and above

10 relations from Strategy and management to Regulation

  • coordinates
  • coordinates
  • coordinates
  • coordinates
  • coordinates
  • coordinates
  • coordinates
  • coordinates
  • coordinates
  • coordinates

A cobertura estadual cresce em camadas

São Paulo testa o método. As outras 26 UFs já têm um núcleo institucional inicial e entram com a mesma régua para poderes estaduais, controle, financiamento, dados, formação, ciência, regulação e entrega municipal.

São Paulo

Piloto em curadoria

Acre

Núcleo inicial curado

Alagoas

Núcleo inicial curado

Amapá

Núcleo inicial curado

Amazonas

Núcleo inicial curado

Bahia

Núcleo inicial curado

Ceará

Núcleo inicial curado

Distrito Federal

Núcleo inicial curado

Espírito Santo

Núcleo inicial curado

Goiás

Núcleo inicial curado

Maranhão

Núcleo inicial curado

Mato Grosso

Núcleo inicial curado

Mato Grosso do Sul

Núcleo inicial curado

Minas Gerais

Núcleo inicial curado

Pará

Núcleo inicial curado

Paraíba

Núcleo inicial curado

Paraná

Núcleo inicial curado

Pernambuco

Núcleo inicial curado

Piauí

Núcleo inicial curado

Rio de Janeiro

Núcleo inicial curado

Rio Grande do Norte

Núcleo inicial curado

Rio Grande do Sul

Núcleo inicial curado

Rondônia

Núcleo inicial curado

Roraima

Núcleo inicial curado

Santa Catarina

Núcleo inicial curado

Sergipe

Núcleo inicial curado

Tocantins

Núcleo inicial curado

Disputes stay on the national ledger

This list shows accepted and live Brazil disputes. It leaves out rejected ones.

No accepted or live Brazil disputes are in the ledger yet.