Skip to content
NCBNational Capability Benchmark
Navigate with โ†‘ โ†“Enter to openEsc to close

Challenge the benchmark

Choose a score and give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider it.

When you submit, the form attaches the current score and confidence for the country and capability you chose.

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

Documented examples

Each record describes something a country built that the indicators do not capture. The source provides the published number; the mechanism is our interpretation.

Scores describe outcomes. These records describe how a country acted, what it needed and what happened. 742 of 742 records include a mechanism. They do not affect scores.

Narrow the list

6 of 742 deliveries

Coordination

2 deliveries linked to Public-private collaboration.

Ecuadorsince 2012still operatingbears on Public-private collaboration

SRI electronic invoicing at economy-wide scale

Ecuador's tax authority received approximately 3.299 billion electronic receipts from January through December 2024, using a legally mandated, digitally signed rail that connects private taxpayers to the public tax system.

3,299,680,838 receipts, electronic receipts received by sri, 2024. Servicio de Rentas Internas, 2024 accountability report, retrieved 2026-08-31.

The move, and what it needed

Ecuador made electronic invoicing a common legal format, supplied a public authorization and validation service, and required private firms to send signed transaction data to the SRI so tax administration and business records shared one machine-readable event.

Preconditions

  • A tax authority with a unique taxpayer register and power to make the format mandatory
  • Digital certificates and a validation service that can process high-volume submissions
  • Free or accessible tools for small firms so the compliance mandate does not become an exclusion mechanism

Where else it has been used: Electronic invoicing travels as a public-private data standard. Ecuador shows the scale benefit of mandatory interoperability, alongside the need to watch who bears the implementation cost and whether the data improves decisions rather than just accumulating.

Limits: Receipt volume measures use of the tax rail, not the accuracy of declarations, additional revenue, compliance costs or service quality. The SRI report notes that totals can change through later cancellations and transmissions, and adoption is partly enforced by regulation rather than voluntary collaboration.

Ecuadorsince 2007still operatingbears on Public-private collaboration

Crรฉdito de Desarrollo Humano for beneficiary-led businesses

Ecuador's Ministry of Economic and Social Inclusion reported delivering 44,622 Crรฉdito de Desarrollo Humano loans in 2024, including 6,622 to Indigenous people, turning a social-transfer registry into small-enterprise finance and market-access support.

44,622 credits, development credits delivered, 2024. 6,622 credits, development credits delivered to indigenous people, 2024. Ministerio de Inclusiรณn Econรณmica y Social, 2024 accountability report, retrieved 2026-08-31.

The move, and what it needed

Ecuador let eligible transfer recipients convert part of a social benefit into a productive credit, then paired public finance with group or individual ventures and a government market-access service rather than leaving a cash transfer disconnected from enterprise support.

Preconditions

  • A reliable social registry that can identify eligible recipients and protect against duplicate claims
  • Payment and credit channels capable of reaching people outside formal banking
  • Business-development and market-access support that can follow a loan beyond the disbursement event

Where else it has been used: Transfer-to-enterprise schemes travel where welfare systems already have reach, but Ecuador's experience points to the missing complement: finance needs coaching, markets and repayment feedback if it is to build agency rather than just advance a benefit.

Limits: Credit counts show administrative disbursement, not repayment, business survival, income gains or whether the projects are productive. The ministry's report combines several beneficiary groups and credit modalities, so the total is not a comparable measure of private investment or a causal poverty effect.

Adaptability

2 deliveries linked to Institutional responsiveness, Disaster preparedness and recovery.

Ecuadorsince 2000still operatingbears on Institutional responsiveness

Dollarization as an emergency monetary redesign

Ecuador adopted the US dollar as legal tender in January 2000 during a banking and currency crisis; a Central Bank review reports inflation falling from 96.1% in 2000 to below 8% in 2003 while the new regime removed the exchange-rate tool.

96.1 %, annual inflation in the crisis year, 2000. 8 % or lower, annual inflation after the transition, 2003. Banco Central del Ecuador, 20 years of dollarization sector-real analysis, retrieved 2026-08-31.

The move, and what it needed

Facing a collapsing currency and banking system, Ecuador made a legally binding switch to the US dollar, converted prices and contracts, and rebuilt financial supervision around a regime that citizens could not devalue by political decree.

Preconditions

  • Political authority to make a fast, irreversible monetary commitment during a crisis
  • Access to enough foreign currency and a banking system that can clear dollar payments
  • Fiscal and financial reforms that prevent the new anchor from being undermined by domestic insolvency

Where else it has been used: Dollarization travels as a crisis commitment, not a generic stability policy. Ecuador's experience makes the trade-off explicit: credibility can be imported, but monetary flexibility and lender-of-last-resort capacity cannot.

Limits: The fall in inflation is an outcome of a regime change during a crisis, not a clean causal estimate of dollarization alone; oil prices, banking repair and fiscal policy also moved. The arrangement stabilises the nominal anchor but gives Ecuador less room to respond to external shocks through its own exchange rate or money supply.

Ecuadorsince 2016delivered and closedbears on Disaster preparedness and recovery

2016 earthquake national emergency coordination

After Ecuador's 7.8-magnitude earthquake in April 2016, the national emergency committee reported 17 shelters and 59 temporary shelters active, assisting 25,931 people while mobile health units and security forces were deployed across affected provinces.

25,931 people, people in activated shelters and temporary shelters, 2016-04-22. 59 shelters, temporary shelters activated, 2016-04-22. Secretarรญa de Gestiรณn de Riesgos, national earthquake situation report no. 36, retrieved 2026-08-31.

The move, and what it needed

Ecuador used a national COE structure with provincial mesas to combine emergency logistics, health, security, road repair and social assistance, while publishing situation reports that gave agencies a common operating picture during a fast-moving shock.

Preconditions

  • A statutory emergency-management authority with a chain of command across provinces
  • Pre-existing military, police, health and municipal logistics that can be pooled quickly
  • A reporting cell able to update needs, shelters and service restoration as conditions change

Where else it has been used: Emergency coordination structures travel when they are rehearsed before the shock. Ecuador's report shows the value of a common operating picture, but the response layer still has to connect to a multi-year recovery authority.

Limits: This is an early response snapshot rather than a completed reconstruction account. Shelter and deployment counts show coordination under pressure, not whether displaced households returned safely, infrastructure was rebuilt resiliently or support reached every affected community.

Building

2 deliveries linked to Large project delivery.

Ecuadorsince 2013still operatingbears on Large project delivery

Metro de Quito, a cross-administration urban rail delivery

Quito opened the first line of its metro in December 2023 after a multi-administration build, and the operator reported more than 54 million passenger trips during 2024 with uninterrupted service.

54,000,000 trips, passenger trips in the first full year, 2024. 23 % above projection, reported demand above projection, 2024. Empresa Pรบblica Metropolitana Metro de Quito, 2024 accountability report, retrieved 2026-08-31.

The move, and what it needed

Quito combined four multilateral lenders, a metropolitan delivery company and an external operator, then renegotiated the operating contract after a suspended launch to clarify responsibilities and restart service across 15 stations.

Preconditions

  • A metropolitan authority able to hold a long project across several mayoral administrations
  • Multilateral finance and procurement rules that can support a technically complex rail system
  • A contract-management team able to diagnose interface failures and renegotiate before the asset is abandoned

Where else it has been used: Urban rail travels as a governance problem as much as an engineering one. Quito shows that commissioning, operator interfaces and a credible restart plan can decide whether a nearly finished asset becomes a service.

Limits: Passenger trips and uninterrupted operation show use after opening, not whether construction met its original cost and schedule or whether the line changes access fairly across Quito. The operator's accountability report is self-reported, and a first-year demand figure cannot establish long-term maintenance or financial sustainability.

Ecuadorsince 2009still operatingbears on Large project delivery

Coca Codo Sinclair hydroelectric plant

Ecuador contracted the 1,500 MW Coca Codo Sinclair plant in October 2009 for USD 1,979.7 million with a 60-month term ending 5 October 2014; the plant entered commercial operation in November 2016, and a National Assembly oversight report found it had cost USD 2,712.5 million by August 2021, about 37 percent above the contract price, excluding a USD 599 million transmission line.

2,712.49 USD million, cost of the project to the state by august 2021, 2021-08. 1,979.7 USD million, epc contract price at signature, 2009-10. Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador, Comisiรณn de Fiscalizaciรณn y Control Polรญtico, Informe General de Fiscalizaciรณn sobre el Proyecto Hidroelรฉctrico Coca Codo Sinclair (Informe Nro. CEPFCP-2021-2023-004-I), retrieved 2026-10-01.

The move, and what it needed

Ecuador's government declared the plant a national priority, signed a turnkey EPC contract with Sinohydro financed by China Eximbank, and let the contractor set implementation costs, which delivered a 1,500 MW plant two years late and well above the contract price.

Preconditions

  • Bilateral resource-backed finance that made a large single project fundable quickly
  • A political decision to size the plant at 1,500 MW before definitive engineering studies existed
  • Weak owner-side engineering and supervision capacity relative to an open EPC contract

Where else it has been used: The turnkey, lender-tied model was repeated across Ecuador's other emblematic hydro plants and in other Chinese-financed projects in the region; the Coca Codo record is the case most cited when that model's owner-side risks are discussed.

Limits: The 37 percent overrun and the roughly 25-month delay are our arithmetic on two figures in the report, not a figure the report states; the report itself compares against the USD 987 million planning estimate, which would make the overrun far larger, so the baseline choice matters. The source is a parliamentary oversight committee report produced in a politically adversarial investigation, written partly as narrative with annexes, inside a 346-page PDF; it is not an audited cost statement, and the 'USD 2.712.490.418,04 millones' wording mixes units. The report also documents thousands of cracks in the turbine distributors, regressive erosion of the Coca river threatening the intake, and net output of 37,927 GWh from April 2016 to May 2022 against about 62,934 GWh expected, so the plant operates well below design; none of that is in the cost metric. The construction contract was signed before financing was firm and outside the public procurement law. Started is the contract signature year, not the start of physical works.