Skip to content
NCBNational Capability Benchmark
Navigate with โ†‘ โ†“Enter to openEsc to close

Challenge the benchmark

Choose a score and give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider it.

When you submit, the form attaches the current score and confidence for the country and capability you chose.

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

Where does South Korea stand on Building?

Dataset 9.3.0

This page reads one capability from the published data and is recomputed with every release. It separates what South Korea does, which makes the score, from what the country has, which sits beside the score, and places the country among the 10 countries at the nearest income. The text describes the data and recommends no policy.

What does the score rest on?

Score85.1Confidence0.57usable evidence

The Building score is the equal-weight mean of the positions of four indicators on a 0 to 100 scale that every country sets together. Confidence measures the evidence behind the score and sits beside it as a second number.

The Building score tracks GDP per capita at r = 0.57 across 123 countries.

Observed indicators

  • Manufacturing value added

    27.4 % of GDP

    World Bank (NV.IND.MANF.ZS), 2025

    Position on the scale80.9Peer median26.810 peers with a value
  • High-technology exports

    36.3 % of manufactured exports

    World Bank (TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS), 2024

    Position on the scale59.4Peer median29.510 peers with a value
  • Electricity connection speed

    100 score 0-100

    World Bank (IC.ELC.TIME.DFRN), 2019

    Position on the scale100.0Peer median78.910 peers with a value
  • Economic fitness

    3.7 index

    World Bank (EF.EFM.UNIV.XD), 2024

    Position on the scale100.0Peer median83.810 peers with a value

No comparable source yet, so lowering confidence: large project delivery and firm scale-up rate.

What South Korea has to work with

Beside each condition, two r values read every country at once, one against income and one against the capability score. Where the r with income is much higher than the r with the score, having the condition goes with being rich more than with the capability measured.

Conditions, not scored

What the country has to work with on this capability. The values are shown as the source published them and are not part of the score, the confidence or the trend. The rank counts the countries with a value, best first.

  • Output per workerWorld Bank (SL.GDP.PCAP.EM.KD), 2025

    99,046 constant 2021 PPP $, rank 24 of 123. GDP per person employed, constant purchasing power parity.

    A condition, not scored: output per worker is income per worker, the wealth the benchmark tests capability against, so it is published beside Building as context (D122).

    • r with income: 0.88 (123 countries)
    • r with the Building score: 0.6 (123 countries)
    • Peer median: 114,073 constant 2021 PPP $ (10 peers with a value)

Where does South Korea sit among its peers?

The peers are the 10 countries at the nearest income. Income is GDP per capita at purchasing power parity, in constant international dollars, for the latest year the World Bank publishes, and distance is measured on a log scale, where half and double are equally far. No country is picked by hand, and the set changes when the data does.

In this release peer income runs from US$ 49,292 to US$ 62,824, and South Korea has US$ 55,697 (2025).

  • Solid ring: usable or good evidence
  • Broken ring: thin evidence, opening further as confidence falls
  • The shaded band is the middle half of the set and the line inside it is the median.
  • South Korea: 85.1
  • Germany: 68.8
  • United Kingdom: 62.8
  • France: 61.9
  • Italy: 59.4
  • Czechia: 53.6
  • Spain: 49.8
  • Canada: 44.7
  • Finland: 41.0
  • Australia: 39.5
  • Cyprus: 22.4

What separates South Korea from its peers?

South Korea scores 85.1 on Building, above the median of the 10 scored peers, which is 51.7.

Indicators placed above the peer median on the scale: manufacturing value added, high-technology exports, electricity connection speed, and economic fitness.

South Korea has less than the peer median of output per worker.

Each sentence compares one position with one median. Why a difference exists, and what to do about it, lie outside this data.

What this reading does not show

  • A national score is a coarse proxy. A capability forms in firms, cities, networks and groups below the level of the country, and a national average only describes the conditions they work in.
  • Peers share income and nothing else. Size, production structure, region and political regime are outside the rule, and a set of 10 countries can change with any revision to GDP.
  • An r reads the whole set at once and says nothing about one country alone. A correlation does not show a cause either.
  • The known artefacts that bear on Building, described on the limits page: artefact A6, artefact A11.
  • And the ones every score in the benchmark carries: artefact A8, artefact A10.