Where does Croatia stand on Shared Purpose?
This page reads one capability from the published data and is recomputed with every release. It separates what Croatia does, which makes the score, from what the country has, which sits beside the score, and places the country among the 10 countries at the nearest income. The text describes the data and recommends no policy.
What does the score rest on?
Confidence is in the thin band, so the score rests on little evidence.
The Shared Purpose score is the equal-weight mean of the positions of three indicators on a 0 to 100 scale that every country sets together. Confidence measures the evidence behind the score and sits beside it as a second number.
The Shared Purpose score tracks GDP per capita at r = 0.25 across 118 countries.
Observed indicators
- Position on the scale59.1Peer median62.49 peers with a value
Tax revenue
21.2 % of GDP
World Bank (GC.TAX.TOTL.GD.ZS), 2023
- Position on the scale82.2Peer median80.59 peers with a value
Income inequality
30.1 Gini 0-100
World Bank (SI.POV.GINI), 2023
- Position on the scale25.3Peer median9.36 peers with a value
Civic participation
10.1 % mentioning
Joint EVS/WVS (A080_01), 2022
No comparable source yet, so lowering confidence: sense of national belonging, volunteering, and political polarisation.
No condition is published beside Shared Purpose in this release, so the page shows only the indicators that make the score.
Where does Croatia sit among its peers?
The peers are the 10 countries at the nearest income. Income is GDP per capita at purchasing power parity, in constant international dollars, for the latest year the World Bank publishes, and distance is measured on a log scale, where half and double are equally far. No country is picked by hand, and the set changes when the data does.
In this release peer income runs from US$ 40,690 to US$ 48,283, and Croatia has US$ 44,172 (2025).
- Solid ring: usable or good evidence
- Broken ring: thin evidence, opening further as confidence falls
- The shaded band is the middle half of the set and the line inside it is the median.
- New Zealand: 82.0
- Slovakia: 76.6
- Romania: 63.9
- Israel: 62.0
- Croatia: 55.5
- Hungary: 51.8
- Russia: 51.7
- Poland: 49.3
- Estonia: 48.8
- Portugal: 46.6
- Japan: 41.7
What separates Croatia from its peers?
Croatia scores 55.5 on Shared Purpose, above the median of the 10 scored peers, which is 51.8.
Indicators placed above the peer median on the scale: income inequality and civic participation.
Indicators placed below the peer median on the scale: tax revenue.
Each sentence compares one position with one median. Why a difference exists, and what to do about it, lie outside this data.
What this reading does not show
- A national score is a coarse proxy. A capability forms in firms, cities, networks and groups below the level of the country, and a national average only describes the conditions they work in.
- Peers share income and nothing else. Size, production structure, region and political regime are outside the rule, and a set of 10 countries can change with any revision to GDP.
- An r reads the whole set at once and says nothing about one country alone. A correlation does not show a cause either.
- The known artefacts that bear on Shared Purpose, described on the limits page: artefact A5, artefact A12, artefact A13, artefact A15.
- And the ones every score in the benchmark carries: artefact A8, artefact A10.